Fannie B. Kalis v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, Millen True Value Hardware and Millen Hardware

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion to extend discovery where “no effort was made to explain why the requested discovery could not have taken place within the original discovery period”
• noting that requests for admission are “deemed admitted by operation of law” if not responded to within 30 days
• holding a court did not err in denying motion to compel filed after deadline to respond to summary-judgment motion because movant was “lax in asserting her rights”
• finding no abuse of discretion in denying motion to compel filed after discovery closed and summary judgment motion was filed
• affirming decision based on admis- sions where responding party never filed a motion to with- draw
• affirming decision based on admissions where responding party never filed a motion to withdraw

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).