Indiana Court of Appeals· 10/3/2002
Davis v. State
Citations
- 775 N.E.2d 1182
- 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 1632
- 2002 WL 31194875
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[F]reestanding fundamental error claims in a post-conviction petition may not be raised.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Vaidik, Barnes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-08-20· cited 787×
- Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-18· cited 316×
- Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-11-23· cited 285×
- McCary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-18· cited 268×
- Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-11-08· cited 230×
- Allen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-06-29· cited 137×
- Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-04-03· cited 118×
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 118×
- Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-18· cited 114×
- Charlton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-07· cited 45×
- Sims v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-07-18· cited 30×
- Blunt-Keene v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-03-24· cited 29×
- Martin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-04· cited 27×
- Ford v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-09-26· cited 9×
- Heyward v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-06-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.