Skip to main content

Mitchell v. State

Citations

  • 726 N.E.2d 1228
  • 2000 Ind. LEXIS 299
  • 2000 WL 419704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where a defendant fails to object to allegedly inappropriate comments of a trial judge, the issue is waived and the defendant must establish fundamental error to receive a new trial
  • holding that trial judge's allegedly inappropriate conduct did not constitute fundamental error
  • holding that trial judge's allegedly inappropriate conduct did not constitute fundamental error
  • determining that the trial, court did not err in correcting the defendant’s sentences for murder and felony neglect because the same evidence was used to prove both offenses
  • affirming the trial court's grant of Mitchell's motion to correct erroneous sentence where Mitchell's sentence violated double jeopardy
  • noting “a defendant who fails to object to an instruction at trial waives any challenge to that instruction on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Shepard, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.