Skip to main content

Seeley v. State

Citations

  • 782 N.E.2d 1052
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 167
  • 2003 WL 264370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellate counsel’s performance was not deficient in failing to search for issues outside the record
  • noting that the passing of one month between the alleged conduct and the issuance of the warrant was not dispositive of a determination of staleness and explaining that based on the type of evidence sought (mirrors with drug residue and not the actual drugs
  • noting that the passing of one month between the alleged conduct and the issuance of the warrant was not dispositive of a determination of staleness and explaining that based on the type of evidence sought (mirrors with drug residue and not the actual drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Sharpnack, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.