Charlton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s closing argument because counsel could have made a strategic decision not to object
• holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor's closing argument because counsel could have made a strategic decision not to object
• holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to prosecutor’s closing argument because counsel could have made a strategic decision not to object
• providing that counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s statements during closing argument because counsel’s “failure to object could well have been a strategic decision by counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).