Alaska Supreme Court· 12/15/1995

Morris v. Morris

Citations

908 P.2d 425
1995 Alas. LEXIS 152
1995 WL 740204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that Civil Rule 60 is not a substitute for failing to file a timely appeal or a vehicle for relitigating issues that have been resolved by a prior judgment (quoting Burrell v. Burrell, 696 P.2d 157, 163 (Alaska 1984)
affirming trial court's denial of Rule 60(b) motion where appellant failed to argue that denial of Rule 60(b) motion was in error and instead attempted to argue underlying substantive issues
affirming trial court’s denial of Rule 60(b) motion where appellant failed to argue that denial of Rule 60(b) motion was in error and instead attempted to argue underlying substantive issues
affirming trial court’s denial of Rule 60(b) motion where appellant failed to argue that denial of Rule 60(b) motion was in error and instead attempted to argue underlying substantive issues
\Civil Rule 60 is not a substitute for a party failing to file a timely appeal; nor does it allow relitigation of issues that have been resolved by the judgment.\
\Civil Rule 60 is not a substitute for a party failing to file a timely appeal; nor does it allow relitigation of issues that have been resolved by the judgment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Bryner, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.