Skip to main content

Hammer v. Hammer

Citations

  • 991 P.2d 195
  • 1999 Alas. LEXIS 146
  • 1999 WL 1025219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that unavailability of liquid marital assets, combined with ex-wife's limited work experience, disability, and parental obligations, ' rendered award of long-term alimony appropriate
  • noting that extended alimony may be awarded when insufficient property exists to eliminate differences between spouses' earning capacities through an unequal property division}. 21 . See, eg., Hunt v. Hunt, 698 P.2d 1168, 1171 (Alaska 1985
  • upholding spousal support award based on trial court's specific calculations of wife's monthly expenses and income
  • affirming award of permanent spousal support as just and necessary due to spouse's lack of work experience, responsibility as child's custodial parent, her deafness, lack of job prospects, and limited ability to retrain for employment
  • remanding for recalculation of child support when \the superior court did not acknowledge the option of income averaging in its findings nor did it explain its reasons for relying on [the father's] most recent year of earnings\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.