Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft v. Olson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the web site operated by foreign corporation, which is similar to Bridgestone’s web site in the minimum contacts inquiry
• interactive website alone insufficient to subject appellant to jurisdiction of Texas court
• “The federal government’s foreign policy interests are not hindered when individual states ensure that large international companies operate in an equitable business environment in which wrongs are redressed by those responsible.”
• parent established U.S. subsidiary through whom it sold its products to customers in U.S., licensed its distinctive trademark to subsidiary which created confusion of identity, and closely supervised and directed subsidiaries' activities
• parent established U.S. subsidiary through whom it sold its products to customers in U.S., licensed its distinctive trademark to subsidiary which created confusion of identity, and closely supervised and directed subsidiaries’ activities
• Tex. App. B Austin 2000, pet. dism = d w.o.j .

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• PHC-Minden, L.P. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2007-08-31· cited 332×
• Shapolsky v. Brewton
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-09-20· cited 115×
• Michel v. Rocket Engineering Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-02-15· cited 109×
• In the Interest of E.A.K.
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-02-28· cited 100×
• El Puerto De Liverpool, S.A. De C v. v. Servi Mundo Llantero S.A. De C.V.
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-08-23· cited 99×
• Ent. Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Emp. Practices Lit.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-08-13· cited 63×
• Karstetter v. Voss
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2006-02-07· cited 58×
• Reiff v. Roy
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2003-10-13· cited 54×
• Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-08-25· cited 51×
• I & JC Corp. v. Helen of Troy L.P.
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2005-05-26· cited 49×
• Aguirre v. Vasquez
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-05-01· cited 49×
• Goodenbour v. Goodenbour
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-06-29· cited 44×
• Experimental Aircraft Ass'n, Inc. v. Doctor
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-02-21· cited 43×
• LeBlanc v. Kyle
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-09-12· cited 36×
• Botter v. American Dental Ass'n
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-12-18· cited 33×
• Parex Resources, Inc. and Ramshorn International Limited v. ERG Resources, LLC
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-01-28· cited 33×
• All Star Enterprise, Inc. v. Buchanan
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-10-08· cited 28×
• Schexnayder v. Daniels
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-02-23· cited 24×
• CRITHFIELD v. Boothe
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2011-05-31· cited 21×
• Navasota Resources, Ltd. v. Heep Petroleum, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-06-30· cited 17×

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• International Shoe Co. v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
• Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
• Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1985-12-04· cited 6,606×
• Cain v. Bain
  Texas Supreme Court· 1986-02-12· cited 4,555×
• In Re King's Estate
  Texas Supreme Court· 1951-12-05· cited 4,309×
• Worford v. Stamper
  Texas Supreme Court· 1991-01-30· cited 1,831×
• Schlobohm v. Schapiro
  Texas Supreme Court· 1990-02-14· cited 687×
• Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. Middleton
  Texas Supreme Court· 1985-09-18· cited 618×
• Roberson v. Robinson
  Texas Supreme Court· 1989-04-19· cited 559×
• In the Interest of W.E.R.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1984-05-09· cited 504×
• Houston First American Savings v. Musick
  Texas Supreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 368×
• Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1977-04-22· cited 321×
• Point Lookout West, Inc. v. Whorton
  Texas Supreme Court· 1987-12-02· cited 318×
• Siskind v. Villa Foundation for Education, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1982-11-03· cited 256×
• Mendoza v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1980-09-12· cited 254×
• Hargrave v. Fibreboard Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-08-01· cited 240×
• United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Carr
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1951-07-11· cited 171×
• Marshall v. Vise
  Texas Supreme Court· 1989-03-29· cited 167×
• Ames v. Ames
  Texas Supreme Court· 1989-07-12· cited 163×
• Fish v. Tandy Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1997-08-14· cited 160×

Other cases named Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft v. Olson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft v. Olson
  Texas Supreme Court· 2000-10-12· cited 4×