Skip to main content
· 6/15/2000

Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft v. Olson

Citations

  • 21 S.W.3d 707
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 3985
  • 2000 WL 766271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the web site operated by foreign corporation, which is similar to Bridgestone’s web site in the minimum contacts inquiry
  • interactive website alone insufficient to subject appellant to jurisdiction of Texas court
  • “The federal government’s foreign policy interests are not hindered when individual states ensure that large international companies operate in an equitable business environment in which wrongs are redressed by those responsible.”
  • parent established U.S. subsidiary through whom it sold its products to customers in U.S., licensed its distinctive trademark to subsidiary which created confusion of identity, and closely supervised and directed subsidiaries' activities
  • parent established U.S. subsidiary through whom it sold its products to customers in U.S., licensed its distinctive trademark to subsidiary which created confusion of identity, and closely supervised and directed subsidiaries’ activities
  • Tex. App. B Austin 2000, pet. dism = d w.o.j .

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Kidd, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.