Schexnayder v. Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating 8 that a website that included the defendant’s “biography, credentials, and job 9 description” was “informational in nature”
• “[t]he facts of the instant case reflect much more than a mere contact, or more than a request for advice or consultation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).