Skip to main content
· 8/14/1997

Fish v. Tandy Corp.

Citations

  • 948 S.W.2d 886
  • 1997 WL 313146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding specific jurisdiction over defendant, a resident of Russia, where defendant extensively negotiated with Texas corporation through phone, fax, mail, and defendant’s personal visits to Texas
  • pre-con-tract negotiations consisting of personal trips to Texas, telephone calls, mail, and faxes to and from Texas supported jurisdiction
  • “[A]t least one agreement at issue in this lawsuit compels arbitration in Texas. Accordingly, Texas has a significant interest in adjudicating the dispute.”
  • “He [Fish] negotiated and contracted with Tandy, a Texas Corporation based in Fort Worth, for distributorships in Russia”
  • “[A]t least one agreement at issue in this lawsuit compels arbitration in Texas. Accordingly, Texas has a significant interest in 9 adjudicating the dispute.”
  • pre-contract negotiations consisting of personal trips to Texas, telephone calls, mail, and faxes to and from Texas supported jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day, Livingston, Richards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.