Worford v. Stamper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court’s order of child support will not be disturbed on appeal unless the complaining party can show a clear abuse of discretion
• holding that a court’s order of child support will not be disturbed on appeal unless the complaining party can show a clear abuse of discretion
• holding that trial court abuses its discretion by acting without reference to guiding rules and principles
• holding that the trial court's judgment must be affirmed if it can be upheld on any legal theory that finds support in the evidence
• concluding that trial court impliedly made all findings necessary to support its order modifying child support obligations
• holding that an order regarding child support will not be disturbed on appeal unless the complaining party can demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).