Shapolsky v. Brewton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs allegations that nonresident defendant made intentional misrepresentations to plaintiff in Texas by phone, fax, and mail to induce plaintiff to contract with defendant were sufficient to support specific jurisdiction
• recognizing that interests of forum state and plaintiff will frequently In support of his contention that defending this case in Texas justify severe burden placed on nonresident defendant
• holding that plaintiff’s allegations that nonresident defendant made intentional misrepresentations to plaintiff in Texas by phone, fax, and mail to induce plaintiff to contract with defendant were sufficient to support specific jurisdiction
• finding nexus between contacts and allegations that misrepresentations induced plaintiff to enter into contract with nonresident defendant
• holding sales agent may be held individually liable under DTPA for misrepresentations
• finding nexus between contacts and allegations that misrepresentations induced plaintiff to enter into contract with nonresident defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).