Skip to main content
· 10/8/2009

All Star Enterprise, Inc. v. Buchanan

Citations

  • 298 S.W.3d 404
  • 172 Oil & Gas Rep. 145
  • 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 7870
  • 2009 WL 3210653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an unpleaded basis for personal jurisdiction can be tried by consent
  • holding website not interactive because, although it invites prospective employees to submit applications, Texas residents were not “targeted for recruitment”
  • holding website not interactive because, although it invites prospective employees to submit applications, Texas residents were not “targeted for recruitment”
  • noting that common stock ownership and shared office space and employees are insufficient to support jurisdictional veil-piercing absent evidence that one entity “exercised meaningful, much less ‘complete,’ control” over the other entity’s “daily activities”
  • noting that common stock ownership and shared office space and employees are insufficient to support jurisdictional veil-piercing absent evidence that one entity “exercised meaningful, much less ‘complete,’ control” over the other entity’s “daily activities”
  • stating that four PHC-Minden factors “are not of uniform significance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eva M. Guzman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.