Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 6/9/1993

Cummings v. Malone

Citations

  • 995 F.2d 817
  • 1993 WL 191168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a district court abused its discretion by refusing to admit evidence of prior inconsistent statements based on confusion under Rule 403 when the credibility of the witness was paramount to the case
  • plaintiff in an excessive force action stated at trial he was not told the reason for the questioning, although he previously testified he was told the reason was to investigate a sexual assault
  • plaintiff in an excessive force action stated at trial he was not told the reason for the questioning, although he previously testified he was told the reason was to investigate a sexual assault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Magill, McMillian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cummings v. Malone

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.