Cummings v. Malone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding abuse of discretion when prior inconsistent statements were not admitted and when “the parties’ descriptions of the events were diametrically -10- opposed [and t]he entire case thus depended on whose story the jury believed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).