Porous Media Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pall Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that statements most likely to constitute commercial speech refer to specific goods or services
• defining business goodwill to include how customers view the quality of the business’s products
• defining business goodwill to include how customers view the quality of the business’s products
• affirming a jury verdict for the plaintiff when the facts showed defendant sent misrepresentations to “only five recipients” but the relevant market had a “concentrated structure” and was dominated by a small number of companies.
• affirming denial of motion for a new trial challenging the $1.6 million goodwill damages verdict in part because of testimony that defendant caused plaintiff to lose “‘between $5 million and $10 million’ in going- concern value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).