Skip to main content
· 10/1/1985

United States v. Carl Estabrook

Citations

  • 774 F.2d 284
  • 19 Fed. R. Serv. 965
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Wjhere it is made clear at the outset of the trial that the defendant’s principal defense is lack of knowledge or intent, and thus the issue is unarguably in dispute, the government may introduce the [other acts] evidence in its ease-in-chief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Gibson, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.