Anthony Romano v. Kenneth Howarth, Michael Juron and Matthew Karkos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that even if a person had a business duty to accurately report incidents, the trustworthiness of a business record prepared by that person is still questionable if that person had motive to report falsely
• excluding business records that lacked \the requisite degree of trustworthiness essential to the business record exception\
• analyzing both an objective and subjective component of an Eighth Amendment claim
• analyzing both an objective and subjective component of an Eighth Amendment claim
• noting Second Circuit “will reverse a judgment entered upon answers to questions which mislead and confuse the jury or which inaccurately frame the issues to be resolved by the jury.” (quoting Cann v. Ford Motor Co., 658 F.2d 54, 58 (2d Cir. 1981)
• plaintiffs “claim that [officer] pushed him against a rail, even if true, is de minimis and therefore fails to state a claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).