Irving v. Dormire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim preclusion did not bar individual-capacity claims against prison officials, one of whom had already defended the plaintiff’s habeas petition in his official capacity
• holding that claim preclusion did not bar individual-capacity claims against prison officials, one of whom had already defended the plaintiff's habeas petition in his official capacity
• \The preclusion principle embodied in the doctrine of collateral estoppel is based upon the need to conserve judicial resources and prevent inconsistent decisions.\
• “The preclusion principle embodied in the doctrine of collateral estoppel is based upon the need to conserve judicial resources and prevent inconsistent decisions.”
• \The preclusion principle embodied in the doctrine of collateral estoppel is based upon the need to conserve judicial resources and prevent inconsistent decisions.\
• court must review the record to determine what was decided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).