Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding general grievance about working conditions and questioning job security did not constitute protected activity where letter did not contain any reference to conduct that is protected by federal anti-discrimination laws
• “We have generally held that comments by those individuals outside of the deci-sionmaking chain are stray remarks, which, standing alone, are inadequate to support an inference of discrimination.”
• “[M]otions often present issues for which final decision is best reserved for a specific trial situation.”
• when discriminatory statements by non-decisionmakers were excluded by the lower court, the Third Circuit held that there was no plain error noting they were mere stray remarks
• “We have generally held that comments by those individuals outside of the decision-making chain are stray remarks, which, standing alone, are inadequate to support an inference of discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).