Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 7/19/1993

Cummings v. Malone

Citations

  • 995 F.2d 817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding abuse of discretion when prior inconsistent statements were not admitted and when “the parties’ descriptions of the events were diametrically -10- opposed [and t]he entire case thus depended on whose story the jury believed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.