Crawford v. Ace Sign, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that misrepresentations alleged under DTPA were nothing more than promises to perform under the contract
• holding that failure to publish yellow page advertisement was not actionable as misrepresentation under DTPA action, but actionable only as breach of contract claim
• holding that failure to perform contractual obligations, rather than statements promising to perform, caused harm “and that injury is governed by contract law, not the DTPA”
• holding action governed by contract, not DTPA, where failure to fulfill contract duty to publish advertisement, not misrepresentations, caused loss of profits
• holding action governed by contract, not DTPA, where failure to fulfill contract duty to publish advertisement, not misrepresentations, caused loss of profits
• holding alleged breach of contract, without more, does not allege a violation of the DTPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).