Foley v. Parlier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, “a double recovery exists when a plaintiff obtains more than one recovery for the same injury
• holding evidence factually sufficient to support fraud finding under clear and convincing standard
• holding evidence factually sufficient to support fraud finding under clear and convincing standard
• contrasting between an impermissible “double recovery” for a single injury and circumstances where recovery for separate injuries from fraud and breach of contract “are necessary to make the plaintiff whole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).