Court of Appeals of Texas· 2/24/2005

Head v. U.S. Inspect DFW, Inc.

Citations

159 S.W.3d 731
2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 1550
2005 WL 450015

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a broken “agreement to furnish a certain quality of services” was not a “misrepresentation” for purposes of DTPA exemption caveat
concluding that trial court did not err in granting summary judgment on claim of unconscionable act when, among other factors, consumer had choice in selecting inspection company
stating that determination of prevailing party must be based upon success on the merits
finding one of the considerations in determining unconscionability of limitation of liability provision in home inspection contract was that defendant was not the only home inspection service available to the plaintiff
relying in part on fact that plaintiff “was represented by a board certified real estate attorney who worked with the listing agent on the house during the purchase” in deciding “that there was no disparity in bargaining power”
“Even under the DTPA, a seller is not liable for failing to disclose information he did not actually know.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cayce, Gardner, McCOY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.