Ken Petroleum Corp. v. Questor Drilling Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that section 127.005(b) did not serve to invalidate an indemnity provision, construing the TO-AIA to give effect to the contract between the parties
• finding that section 127.005 only requires a writing to memorialize that each party has agreed to provide insurance to support the indemnity obligations
• finding that section 127.005 only requires a writing to memorialize that each party has agreed to provide insurance to support the indemnity obligations
• holding indemnity provision of contract was merely an agreement and not misrepresentation that agreement conferred rights and benefits that it did not have or involve or that are prohibited by law, within section 17.46(b)(12)
• holding indemnity provision of contract was merely an agreement and not misrepresentation that agreement conferred rights and benefits that it did not have or involve or that are prohibited by law, within section 17.46(b)(12)
• reversing two appellate courts and holding indemnity obligations enforceable to extent coverage and dollar limits applied equally

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).