Mays v. Pierce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a laundry-list violation and an unconscionable course of action allegation are “distinct and [that] either basis will support recovery”
• listing breach by defendant as a necessary element of a breach of contract claim
• “[The plaintiff] did not show she was harmed by [the defendant’s] representations, but only showed harm caused by [the defendant’s] failure to perform.”
• “[The plaintiff] did not show she was harmed by [the defendant’s] representations, but only showed harm caused by [the defendant’s] failure to perform.”
• breach of contract occurs when one party fails or refuses to do something it has promised to do
• “A plaintiff need not prove reliance to establish a claim based on unconscionability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).