Dickey v. Club Corp. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding affiant’s unchallenged statement that he was movant’s general manager sufficient to show personal knowledge of facts related to employer’s business
• holding affiant’s unchallenged statement that he was movant’s general manager sufficient to show personal knowledge of facts related to employer’s business
• holding affiant = s unchallenged statement that he was movant = s general manager sufficient to show personal knowledge of facts related to employer = s business
• married members sued country club because club’s bylaws did not allow them to play golf together on Saturday mornings
• involvement of property right alone does not necessarily authorize judicial intervention in absence of arbitrariness, fraud, or collusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).