Skip to main content
· 3/7/1996

Accelerated Christian Education, Inc. v. Oracle Corp.

Citations

  • 925 S.W.2d 66
  • 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 936
  • 1996 WL 98030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting federal law supports trend toward enforcing valid forum selection clause in upholding forum selection clause providing for litigation of disputes in California
  • enforcing clause stating that “[i]n any legal action relating to this Agreement, [Accelerated] agrees (a) to the exercise of jurisdiction over it by a state or federal court in San Francisco or San Mateo County, California; and (b
  • “In any legal action relating to this Agreement, [Accelerated] agrees (a) to the exercise of jurisdiction oyer it by a state or federal court in San Francisco or San Mateo County, California; and (b
  • “We do not consider issues that were not raised in the courts below, but parties are free to construct new arguments in support of issues properly before the Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kinkeade, Ovard, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.