Michael Malik Allah v. Thomas Seiverling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an allegation that a prisoner was kept in administrative segregation to punish him for filing civil rights complaints stated a retaliation claim
• holding that an allegation that a prisoner was kept in administrative segregation as punishment for filing civil rights complaints stated a retaliation claim
• recognizing that a prisoner states a viable retaliation claim by alleging he was placed in administrative segregation as a punishment for filing civil rights complaints
• holding that an allegation that a prisoner was kept in administrative segregation to punish him for filing civil rights complaints stated a retaliation claim
• concluding that the prisoner-plaintiff stated a First Amendment retaliation claim where he alleged that he had been kept in administrative segregation in retaliation for filing civil rights claims against prison officials
• concluding that the prisoner-plaintiff stated a First Amendment retaliation claim where he alleged that he had been kept in administrative segregation in retaliation for filing civil rights claims against prison officials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).