Moss v. U.S. Secret Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the district court’s deferral of the summary judgment motion
• holding that the allegations in 22 the complaint “must be plausibly suggestive of a claim entitling the plaintiff to relief”
• concluding that a plaintiff’s complaint fails to plead facts sufficient to allege a constitutional right violation, which is required by Bivens
• holding that a “bald 16 allegation” of discriminatory, “impermissible motive” on the defendants’ part “standing 17 alone, is conclusory and is therefore not entitled to an assumption of truth”
• holding that a “bald allegation” of discriminatory, 15 “impermissible motive” on the defendants’ part “standing alone, is conclusory and is 16 therefore not entitled to an assumption of truth”
• explaining that “the district court ha[d] yet to order any discovery or to compel the Agents to submit to depositions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).