District of Columbia· 6/7/2010

Conservation Force v. Salazar

Citations

715 F. Supp. 2d 99
2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56116
2010 WL 2244122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a “12-month finding [is] required only where [a] 90-day finding concludes that a petition ‘presents substantial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted,’ ” and that, until that time, “the need for a 12-month finding remained speculative”
dismissing claim for failing to comply with 60-day notice requirement, but noting that plaintiff can bring a new suit after they have provided proper statutory notice
dismissing claim for failing to comply with 60-day 4 notice requirement, but noting that plaintiff can bring a new suit after they have provided proper 5 statutory notice
“[T]he APA permits courts to review ‘final agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court.’” Here, the ESA’s citizen-suit provision provides an adequate remedy.”
claim for declaratory relief will not be moot where there is a “substantial controversy, between parties having adverse legal interests, of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a declaratory judgment”
“arguments of counsel ... are not evidence” (internal quotations and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.