Skip to main content
· 12/16/1975

Weinstein v. Bradford

Citations

  • 423 U.S. 147
  • 96 S. Ct. 347
  • 46 L. Ed. 2d 350
  • 1975 U.S. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that doctrine did not prevent the case from being moot because the “ease, not a class action, clearly does not satisfy the latter element”
  • addressing whether a “challenged action was in its duration too short to be fully litigated prior to its cessation or expiration[.]”
  • refusing to review an otherwise moot appeal because case was not \capable of repetition\
  • challenge to parole procedure moot when former prisoner unlikely again to encounter parole system
  • challenge to parole procedure moot when former prisoner unlikely again to encounter parole system
  • former inmate's challenge to parole decisions mooted upon his release from supervision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.