· 12/16/1975
Weinstein v. Bradford
Citations
- 423 U.S. 147
- 96 S. Ct. 347
- 46 L. Ed. 2d 350
- 1975 U.S. LEXIS 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that doctrine did not prevent the case from being moot because the “ease, not a class action, clearly does not satisfy the latter element”
- addressing whether a “challenged action was in its duration too short to be fully litigated prior to its cessation or expiration[.]”
- refusing to review an otherwise moot appeal because case was not \capable of repetition\
- challenge to parole procedure moot when former prisoner unlikely again to encounter parole system
- challenge to parole procedure moot when former prisoner unlikely again to encounter parole system
- former inmate's challenge to parole decisions mooted upon his release from supervision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.