Orson, Inc. T/a Roxy Screening Rooms v. Miramax Film Corp. Orson, Inc., D/b/a/ Roxy Screening Rooms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that once movant shows absence of genuine issue for trial, nonmovant may not rest upon mere allegations in pleadings
• indicating that once movant shows absence of genuine issue for trial, nonmovant may not rest upon mere allegations in pleadings
• stating that, under Pennsylvania law, any undefined word “must be construed according to the rules of grammar and according to the common and approved usage”
• noting that, “Any word or phrase, not otherwise defined, must be construed according to the rules of grammar and according to the common and approved usage”
• noting that proof of actual effects “is often impossible to make”
• remarking “[t]he Supreme Court has instructed that vertical restraints of trade, which do not present an express or implied agreement to set resale prices, are evaluated under the rule of reason”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).