Skip to main content
· 8/29/2001

Hayes v. Whitman

Citations

  • 264 F.3d 1017
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4532
  • 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20043
  • 52 ERC (BNA) 1054
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19323
  • 2001 WL 987502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing allegations of fact in a response cannot cure a deficiency in a complaint
  • noting it “might be appropriate for a court to consider additional facts or legal theories asserted in a response brief to a motion to dismiss[,]” so long as those facts and theories are consistent with those pleaded in the complaint
  • “[W]e have often found untimeliness alone a sufficient reason to deny leave to amend.” (quotations omitted)
  • more than two years after the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Anderson, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.