· 8/29/2001
Hayes v. Whitman
Citations
- 264 F.3d 1017
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4532
- 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20043
- 52 ERC (BNA) 1054
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19323
- 2001 WL 987502
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing allegations of fact in a response cannot cure a deficiency in a complaint
- noting it “might be appropriate for a court to consider additional facts or legal theories asserted in a response brief to a motion to dismiss[,]” so long as those facts and theories are consistent with those pleaded in the complaint
- “[W]e have often found untimeliness alone a sufficient reason to deny leave to amend.” (quotations omitted)
- more than two years after the complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ebel, Anderson, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.