Supreme Court· 6/29/1988

Bowen v. Massachusetts

Citations

487 U.S. 879
108 S. Ct. 2722
101 L. Ed. 2d 749
1988 U.S. LEXIS 3029
56 U.S.L.W. 4878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that suits seeking actual funds owed to claimants are suits for \injunctive\ relief under APA § 702
holding that section 704 does not bar District Court jurisdiction when the Claims Court does not provide a \special and adequate review procedure\ for that claim
holding that “[section] 704 ‘does not provide additional judicial remedies in situations where the Congress has provided special and adequate review procedures’ ”
holding that a district court has jurisdiction under the APA to review a disallowance by HHS
holding that the Court of Federal Claims lacks “the general equitable powers of a district court to grant prospective relief’
holding that “[t]he Claims Court does not have the general equitable powers of a district court to grant prospective relief’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, O'Connor, White, Scalia, Rehnquist, Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

906 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

79 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bowen v. Massachusetts

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.