Rubinstein v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that comments were stray remarks when plaintiff had failed to offer evidence that they were proximate in time or related to his failure to receive a raise or a promotion
• holding that a $750,000 punitive damages award, in comparison to a $2,500 compensatory damages award, violates due process
• concluding that comments were stray remarks when plaintiff had failed to offer evidence that they were proximate in time or related to his failure to receive a raise or a promotion
• concluding that comments were stray remarks when plaintiff had failed to offer evidence that they were proximate in time or related to his failure to receive a raise or a promotion
• finding that isolated remarks by one committee member did not demonstrate discriminatory intent
• upholding summary judgment for employer even where some evidence of pretext, because overall lack of evidence of discriminatory intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).