John D. Dupree v. Warden, Attorney General, State of Alabama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recommending the adoption of what would become 11th Circuit Rule 3-1 so that district courts do not have “to spend significant amounts of time and resources reviewing every issue—whether objected to or not.”
• recommending the adoption of what would become 11th Circuit Rule 3-1 so that district courts do not have “to spend significant amounts of time and resources reviewing every issue—whether objected to or not.”
• recommending the adoption of what would become 11th Circuit Rule 3-1 so that district courts do not have “to spend significant amounts of time and resources reviewing every issue—whether objected to or not.”
• addressing Clisby error with respect to a § 2254 habeas corpus petition
• emphasis in 13 USCA11 Case: 17-11264 Date Filed: 10/13/2020 Page: 14 of 26 original
• addressing a section 2254 petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).