Skip to main content
· 3/6/2002

Tollett v. The City of Kemah

Citations

  • 285 F.3d 357
  • 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1451
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3521
  • 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 596
  • 2002 WL 355917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, under Rule 37, a party could not recover monetary sanctions on discovery requests unrelated to a failure to comply with. discovery
  • noting that Texas courts use factors similar to those used in federal courts in awarding attorney’s fees
  • holding the relevant legal market is the community in which the district court sits
  • refusing to reexamine an earlier panel’s conclusion following the submission of allegedly new evidence at a district court’s hearing on remand
  • approving requested hourly rate based on counsel’s affidavit and absence of any contest by the opposing party
  • approving the requested hourly rate because it was not questioned by opposing party and debtor's counsel had provided an affidavit in support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Wiener, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.