Third Circuit· 7/5/2018
Clientron Corp. v. Devon It, Inc.
Citations
- 894 F.3d 568
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a sanction must be “just,” which “represents the general due process restrictions on the court’s discretion”
- noting a court “may depart from the list of sanctions expressly endorsed by the rule”
- noting that Rule 37 sanctions left to court’s discretion
- stating, in the context of Rule 37, that “the decision to impose sanctions is ‘generally entrusted to the discretion of the district court’” (quoting Bowers, 475 F.3d at 538)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greenaway, Jones, Krause
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyThird Circuit· 1984-11-05· cited 2,455×
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court· 1981-05-26· cited 882×
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Inc.Second Circuit· 2010-08-25· cited 511×
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1909-02-23· cited 410×
- Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., AppelleeFirst Circuit· 1994-06-29· cited 229×
- Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaThird Circuit· 1995-02-15· cited 177×
- Martin v. BrownThird Circuit· 1995-08-23· cited 164×
- Wicks v. Milzoco Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-29· cited 161×
- Lumax Industries, Inc. v. AultmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-12-29· cited 154×
- In Re Prudential Insurance Company America Sales Practice Litigation Agent Actions, Michael P. Malakoff, Esquire, and Malakoff, Doyle & Finberg, P.C.Third Circuit· 2002-01-24· cited 142×
- Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit and Educational Funds v. Andrew LutykThird Circuit· 2003-06-11· cited 109×
- 718 Arch Street Associates, Ltd. v. BlatsteinThird Circuit· 1999-09-03· cited 93×
- Timothy McLaughlin v. Phelan Hallinan & SchmiegThird Circuit· 2014-06-26· cited 91×
- Compaq Computer Corp. v. Ergonome Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2004-10-05· cited 75×
- Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England Inc.First Circuit· 2010-04-29· cited 70×
- Clingerman v. SadowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-16· cited 64×
- Crispin-Taveras v. Municipality of CarolinaFirst Circuit· 2011-05-25· cited 57×
Other cases named Clientron Corp. v. Devon It, Inc.
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Clientron Corp. v. Devon IT, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-08-28· cited 9×
- Clientron Corp. v. Devon IT, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-12-22· cited 4×
- Clientron Corp. v. Devon IT, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-08-08· cited 2×
- Clientron Corp. v. Devon IT, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-08-28· cited 1×
- Clientron Corp v. Devon IT IncThird Circuit· 2018-07-05
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.