Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/27/1996

Commonwealth v. Rodriquez

Citations

673 A.2d 962
449 Pa. Super. 319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that when appellate court is presented with challenge to sufficiency of evidence, it must evaluate entire trial record and consider all evidence actually received
holding that the evidence that defendant and two other men punched and kicked lone victim while victim was on ground, stopping only when police officer arrived, was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for aggravated assault
holding sufficient evidence to establish robbery where a victim was assaulted and, thereafter, his pockets were “ransacked” after he had been rendered prostrate
holding sufficient evidence to establish robbery where a victim was assaulted and, thereafter, his pockets were “ransacked” after he had been rendered prostrate
stating “questions of merger relate to the legality of sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Cirillo, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.