Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 10/27/1994
Commonwealth v. Mercado
Citations
- 649 A.2d 946
- 437 Pa. Super. 228
- 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that failure to provide support for an issue may result in waiver of the claim
- stating that failure to provide support for an issue may result in waiver of the claim
- stating that failure to provide support for an issue may result in waiver of the claim
- stating that failure to provide support for an issue may result in waiver of the claim
- defendant waived issue that was raised in statement of questions by failing to include any support in the appellate brief
- malice, as an essential element of third-degree murder, may be inferred from the use of a deadly weapon upon a vital part of the body
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Kelly, Brosky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. Cruz-CentenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-12-04· cited 332×
- Commonwealth v. NicholsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-02· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. JuddSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-04-12· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. RodriquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-27· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. MarksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-18· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. BaskervilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-08-01· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-29· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-22· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. RichterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-05-22· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. LibengoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-12-16· cited 16×
- Com. v. McKnight, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-10-23· cited 11×
- State v. Van HuizenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2017-02-16· cited 4×
- Com. v. Akhmedov, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-07-29
- Commonwealth v. BungarzBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 1998-12-07
- Com. v. Peters, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-08-07
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-06· cited 312×
- Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-11-04· cited 238×
- Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-26· cited 203×
- Commonwealth v. BonomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-05-28· cited 168×
- Commonwealth v. OhleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-14· cited 157×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-23· cited 137×
- Commonwealth v. ProsdocimoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-17· cited 136×
- Commonwealth v. McBrideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-01· cited 135×
- Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-20· cited 134×
- Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-11-30· cited 133×
- Commonwealth v. WojdakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-10-18· cited 133×
- Commonwealth v. CasperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 124×
- Stidham v. Millvale Sportsmen's ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-13· cited 100×
- Commonwealth v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 92×
- Commonwealth v. MamonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-17· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. LaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-29· cited 77×
- Commonwealth v. LemanskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-07-20· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. HammerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-27· cited 73×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.