Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 10/7/1994

Commonwealth v. Lawson

Citations

650 A.2d 876
437 Pa. Super. 521
1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding substantial question was not presented by claim that trial court ignored the appellant’s rehabilitative needs
holding substantial question was not presented by claim that trial court ignored the appellant’s rehabilitative needs
claim that sentencing court did not give adequate consideration to defendant’s rehabilitative needs does not present a substantial question
claim of error for failing to consider rehabilitative needs does not present substantial question
claim of error for failing to consider rehabilitative needs does not present substantial question
claim of error for- failing to consider rehabilitative needs does not present substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Tamilia, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.