Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Davis

Citations

  • 799 A.2d 860
  • 2002 Pa. Super. 167
  • 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that weight and sufficiency claims “are discrete inquiries”
  • reiterating that weight and sufficiency claims “are discrete inquiries”
  • reiterating that weight and sufficiency claims “are discrete inquiries”
  • “[w]eight of the evidence and sufficiency of the evidence are discrete inquiries”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cercone, Olszewski, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.