Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/9/1984

Commonwealth v. Leatherbury

Citations

473 A.2d 1040
326 Pa. Super. 179
1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding evidence was sufficient to convict for robbery where two men approached an elderly man on the street, grabbed both his arms, and demanded his wallet
holding evidence was sufficient to convict for robbery where two men approached an elderly man on the street, grabbed both his arms, and demanded his wallet
affirming convictions for robbery and assault (which required a threat of “imminent serious bodily injury”
reasoning “[n]either the fact that [the appellants] did not inflict bodily injury nor that they were unsuccessful in obtaining the victim’s money was controlling.”
stating “[n]either the fact that [the appellants] did not inflict bodily injury nor - 22 - J-S63001-18 that they were unsuccessful in obtaining the victim’s money was controlling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Wieand, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.