Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/8/1995

Commonwealth v. Hodge

Citations

658 A.2d 386
441 Pa. Super. 653
1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a criminal defendant’s election not to file an optional post-verdict motion resulted in a waiver of the claim that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence
holding that a criminal defendant's election not to file an optional post-verdict motion resulted in a waiver of the claim that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence
holding that a criminal defendant had waived a challenge to the weight of evidence by filing an immediate appeal without first raising this issue with the trial court
“Therefore, a defendant, who wishes to seek a new trial on grounds that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence, must necessarily raise this issue via post-sentencing motion in the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Olszewski, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.