Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/16/1990

Commonwealth v. Ennis

Citations

574 A.2d 1116
394 Pa. Super. 1
1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

claim that sentencing court erroneously factored defendant’s low I.Q. as sentence aggravator presented challenge to discretionary aspects of sentencing
claim that sentencing court erroneously factored defendant's low I.Q. as sentence aggravator presented challenge to discretionary aspects of sentencing
trial counsel not ineffective for failing to object to omission of the definition of theft from instructions for robbery where this Court already held the evidence to be sufficient to sustain the robbery conviction
trial counsel not ineffective for failing to object to omission of the definition of theft from instructions for robbery where this Court already held the evidence to be sufficient to sustain the robbery conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Montemuro, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.