Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/7/2002
Commonwealth v. Mulholland
Citations
- 794 A.2d 398
- 2002 Pa. Super. 59
- 2002 Pa. Super. LEXIS 209
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that investigative detention commenced when officer \parked his cruiser in such a fashion as to make it difficult if not impossible for the van to leave the parking lot\
- holding that investigative detention commenced when officer “parked his cruiser in such a fashion as to make it difficult if not impossible for the van to leave the parking lot”
- holding that a seizure occurred when, in a low-crime rural area, an officer pulled a marked police vehicle “into the lot and parked in front of the van, with the purpose of blocking its means of egress,” and the officer activated the patrol vehicle’s alley lights
- investigative detention commenced when officer \parked his cruiser in such a fashion as to make it difficult if not impossible for the van to leave the parking lot\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sole, Hudock, Cavanaugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Garcia-CantuCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-05-07· cited 791×
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-06-04· cited 96×
- Commonwealth v. AuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-04-26· cited 87×
- Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-04-19· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-11-22· cited 35×
- State v. BakerIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-12-22· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. HamptonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-02-12· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. GouldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-05-09· cited 34×
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-01-09· cited 25×
- Campbell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-02-01· cited 15×
- State of Washington v. Otoniel CarrieroCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-04-25· cited 8×
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2009-10-20· cited 5×
- State v. Garcia-Cantu, CandelarioCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-05-07
- People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-05
- People of Michigan v. Matthew Scott DuffMichigan Supreme Court· 2024-07-26
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-09· cited 417×
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-09-17· cited 237×
- Commonwealth v. NesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-25· cited 199×
- Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-19· cited 193×
- United States v. Yong Hyon KimThird Circuit· 1994-06-30· cited 155×
- Commonwealth v. DeWittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-20· cited 144×
- Commonwealth v. LuvSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-22· cited 102×
- Commonwealth v. DeHartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-19· cited 95×
- Commonwealth v. E.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-21· cited 92×
- Commonwealth v. PhinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-10-16· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. McCleaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-28· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-29· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. ValentinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-03· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-09· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-26· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.