Skip to main content

Campbell v. State

Citations

  • 841 N.E.2d 624
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 131
  • 2006 WL 231660

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant abandoned handgun underneath car before he was seized and therefore the handgun was not subject to protections of Fourth Amendment or Article 1, Section 11
  • shining of spotlight on defendant, who was standing next to a parked car, not a seizure
  • shining of spotlight on defendant, who was standing next to a parked car, not a seizure
  • using the same test, holding that defendant was not seized under the Fourth Amendment or Article 1, Section 11
  • collecting state court cases and stating that, by itself, shining of spotlight does not reflect a show of authority to make a reasonable person believe that he or she is not free to leave
  • Campbell’s search and seizure claim under Indiana Constitution was without merit because he abandoned the firearm in question by throwing it under a car

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.