Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/10/1997

Commonwealth v. Mulholland

Citations

702 A.2d 1027
549 Pa. 634
1997 Pa. LEXIS 2102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding mere, allegations of a conflict of interest, however,,are insufficient to require replacement of a district attorney
finding no Brady violation where the withheld statement was duplicative of other evidence in possession of defense
“In a record containing thousands of pages, this court will not search every page to substantiate a party’s incomplete argument.”
the decision as to whether immunity should or should not be granted to a witness rests entirely within the judgment of the executive branch of government, i.e., the Attorney General or District Attorney
“In a record containing thousands of pages, this [C]ourt will not search every page to substantiate a party’s incomplete argument.”
“In a record containing thousands of pages, this court will not search every page to substantiate a party’s incomplete argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Mulholland

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.