Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cooper

Citations

  • 994 A.2d 589
  • 2010 Pa. Super. 60
  • 2010 Pa. Super. LEXIS 322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual with the intention of asking that individual questions
  • stating that an officer is not required to be absolutely certain the individual is armed; rather an officer only has to reasonably believe that his safety or the safety of others was in danger
  • stating that an officer is not required to be absolutely certain the individual is armed; rather an officer only has to reasonably believe that his safety or the safety of others was in danger
  • reversing trial court's denial of motion to suppress where there was insufficient evidence to support the frisk of the defendant for weapons
  • distinguishing faulty pat-down during the day from several valid ones occurring “late at night”
  • finding no reasonable suspicion to conduct a pat-down where Cooper, who was standing next to a dumpster when police approached, moved his hand toward his pocket but immediately stopped moving when so directed by the officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donohue, Allen, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.