Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/26/1999
Commonwealth v. Smith
Citations
- 732 A.2d 1226
- 1999 Pa. Super. 96
- 1999 Pa. Super. LEXIS 819
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that whether a seizure has been effected hinges on “whether a reasonable person would feel free to decline the officers’ requests or otherwise terminate the encounter”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McEwen, Stevens, Lally-Green
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. EliaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-24· cited 148×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-19· cited 111×
- Commonwealth v. BarnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-07-31· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. McCleaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-28· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. YasipourSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-17· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. HaywardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-06-27· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-04-19· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. GutierrezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-01-24· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. BessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-01-02· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. MulhollandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-03-07· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-23· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-11· cited 7×
- Weinberg v. Comcast Cablevision of Philadelphia, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-30· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2013-12-20
- Commonwealth v. BrantleyDelaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2012-05-22
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- Blystone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1990-02-28· cited 551×
- Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-26· cited 208×
- Commonwealth v. BlystoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-17· cited 180×
- Commonwealth v. BarudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-30· cited 175×
- Commonwealth v. MikulanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 166×
- United States v. Yong Hyon KimThird Circuit· 1994-06-30· cited 155×
- Commonwealth v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-07-30· cited 146×
- Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-14· cited 124×
- Commonwealth v. ShoatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-24· cited 123×
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-24· cited 120×
- Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-05· cited 108×
- Commonwealth v. TrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-12· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. RileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-09· cited 74×
- GLANCEY v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-03-20· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. BuschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-04-28· cited 44×
- In the Interest of JermaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-22· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.